İlgili sorular

0 oy
0 cevap 9 kez görüntülendi
0 oy
0 cevap 11 kez görüntülendi
0 oy
0 cevap 11 kez görüntülendi
0 oy
0 cevap 14 kez görüntülendi
0 oy
0 cevap 12 kez görüntülendi
0 oy
11 kez görüntülendi
(1.8k puan) tarafından
In this detailed comparison, we’ll explore two of the latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 flagship foldable phones: the Samsung Z Fold 6 and the Vivo X Fold 3 Pro. From build quality to battery life, and everything in between, let's dive into the features and capabilities of these cutting-edge devices to help you decide which one is right for you.

Build Quality and Design
Samsung Z Fold 6:
Outer Screen: 6.3 inches
Inner Screen: 8.03 inches
Weight: 239 grams
Thickness (folded): 12.1 mm
Stylus Support: Yes (S Pen)
Hinges: Slightly revised from previous models
Protection: Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on front and back
Water Resistance: IPX8
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro:
Outer Screen: 6.53 inches
Inner Screen: 8.03 inches
Weight: 236 grams
Thickness (folded): 11.2 mm
Stylus Support: No
Hinges: Carbon fiber, lighter weight
Protection: Chinese brand shatter-resistant glass
Water Resistance: IPX8

Both phones have narrow outer screens, making typing slightly challenging but manageable. The Z Fold 6 offers a stylus option, which the Vivo lacks. Build quality is excellent on both, with the Vivo having a lighter and slightly thinner design.

Display and Screen Quality

Samsung Z Fold 6:

Outer Screen: 6.3 inches AMOLED, 1600 nits brightness
Inner Screen: 8.03 inches AMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate
Camera: Under-display (4 MP)

Vivo X Fold 3 Pro:

Outer Screen: 6.53 inches AMOLED, 4500 nits brightness (claimed)
Inner Screen: 8.03 inches AMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate
Camera: Punch-hole (32 MP)

Both devices feature high-quality AMOLED displays with smooth 120Hz refresh rates. Vivo claims higher brightness levels, though real-world testing shows similar performance in direct sunlight. The Z Fold 6 has an under-display camera for a cleaner look, while the Vivo’s punch-hole camera offers better quality.

Camera Performance

Samsung Z Fold 6:

Rear Cameras: 50 MP main, 12 MP ultra-wide, 10 MP telephoto (3x optical zoom)
Front Camera: 10 MP

Vivo X Fold 3 Pro:

Rear Cameras: 50 MP main, 50 MP ultra-wide, 64 MP periscopic telephoto (3x optical zoom)
Front Camera: 32 MP

The Vivo X Fold 3 Pro excels in camera hardware with Zeiss branding and a dedicated V3 chip for image processing. It offers superior image quality, especially with its higher resolution telephoto camera. The Z Fold 6 holds its own but falls slightly short in camera comparison.

Battery Life and Charging

Samsung Z Fold 6:

Battery: 4400 mAh
Charging: 25W wired, wireless charging supported
Battery Life: Around 1 hour and 16 minutes for a full charge

Vivo X Fold 3 Pro:

Battery: 5700 mAh
Charging: 120W wired, wireless charging supported
Battery Life: Around 26 minutes for a full charge

The Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a significantly larger battery and faster charging speeds. Despite its larger battery, the Vivo is lighter than the Samsung. For heavy users, the Vivo’s battery performance is a clear advantage.

Software and Features

Samsung Z Fold 6:

Operating System: One UI with Samsung DeX
Multitasking: Advanced with desktop mode, multiple window options
Bloatware: Minimal, but some pre-installed apps

Vivo X Fold 3 Pro:

Operating System: Funtouch OS
Multitasking: Good, but lacks desktop mode
Bloatware: Minimal, mainly system apps

Samsung's software experience is more refined, especially with features like Samsung DeX for a desktop-like experience. Vivo's software is improving but still lacks some of the advanced features that Samsung offers.

Performance

Samsung Z Fold 6:

Processor: Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
RAM: 12 GB
Storage: 512 GB (UFS 4.0)
Benchmark Scores: Lower compared to Vivo

Vivo X Fold 3 Pro:

Processor: Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
RAM: 16 GB
Storage: 512 GB (UFS 4.0)
Benchmark Scores: Higher, especially in GPU performance

The Vivo X Fold 3 Pro outperforms the Samsung Z Fold 6 in benchmarks, particularly in GPU performance and random access speeds. This translates to smoother gaming and overall better performance in demanding applications.

Additional Features

Samsung Z Fold 6:

USB Type-C (3.2), Samsung DeX
Audio: Stereo speakers
Connectivity: Gorilla Glass 5G, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2

Vivo X Fold 3 Pro:

USB Type-C (3.2), IR transmitter
Audio: Stereo speakers
Connectivity: 5G, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2

Both phones offer excellent connectivity options and stereo speakers. Samsung’s DeX provides a superior desktop experience, while the Vivo includes an IR transmitter for additional functionality.

Conclusion

Choosing between the Samsung Z Fold 6 and Vivo X Fold 3 Pro depends on your priorities:

Samsung Z Fold 6: Best for those who need stylus support, a refined software experience with Samsung DeX, and good overall performance.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro: Ideal for users who prioritize camera quality, battery life, fast charging, and slightly better overall performance.

Both devices are top-tier foldables with their own strengths. Evaluate your needs and choose the one that best aligns with your preferences.

Bu soruya cevap vermek için lütfen giriş yapınız veya kayıt olunuz.

Hoş geldiniz, Dt. Şirin Abacı'ya ilettiğiniz sağlık sorularınız soru kategorisine göre cevaplandırmaktadır.. Lütfen doktorlarımıza ileteceğiniz soruları açık, anlaşılır, imla kurallarına uygun olacak şekilde yazınız
Online doktora sor
...